Channel: Nerd City

Category: Comedy

Tags: mike martinmikemartin1982dadexposedworstdaddyofivebrain

Description: What kind of a dad would do this? Wonder no more! It's time to go inside in the mind of DaddyoFive, the “Worst Dad on Youtube”! Doctor Downvote has gotten his hands on the original disappearing ink that once belonged to DaddyOFive, used in their ill-fated “Disappearing Ink Prank” which lit the powder keg of controversy that (has almost) destroyed their channel. With Cody and Emma granted a protection order against father Mike Martin and taken out of the home by Maryland CPS, and nearly all of their videos now set to “private”, it may seem as if the DaddyoFive channel is no more, but it's not dead yet. Using that ink, and award belonging to Philip DeFrano, Doctor Downvote puts evil science to work and figures out what kind of a man would create content that celebrated the misery of children. WORST DAD ON YOUTUBE: How repulsive was the hidden content of Daddyofive? youtu.be/QOVrrL5KtsM Source: Daddyofive: youtube.com/channel/UC8lV8KIVWvfsaqOi_d3Wu3w Back-up source: archive.org/download/DaddyOFive-youtube Have You Ever Had A Dream (Wattz Trap Remix) by Wattzbeatz: youtube.com/watch?v=_yMeMKzb7Gk Thank you to Freakykeller, who made the original comment and reddit thread on r/nerdcity about daddyofive: reddit.com/r/nerdcity/comments/5znppr/wanted_daddyofive_bust This video contains source materials as well as publicly available information published or cited by journalist Nick Monroe, as part of his exhaustive work on the DaddyOFive story: nickmonroestuff.wordpress.com/2017/04/23/the-down-low-of-daddyofive nickmonroestuff.wordpress.com/2017/05/05/the-legacy-of-daddyofive Nick Monroe on Twitter: twitter.com/nickmon1112 Do5 art by: twitter.com/sketchartist76 Have a suggestion for the next topic to be explored by Doctor Downvote? Reddit: reddit.com/r/nerdcity Twitter: twitter.com/thenerdcity ................................................................................................. MESSAGE TO Daddyofive Rights Holders: This video is fair use under U.S. copyright law because it is transformative in nature, and uses no more of the original than necessary. Furthermore, this video is protected speech as outlined by the first amendment of The United States Constitution.