Channel: Full Fat Videos

Category: Education

Tags: baby yodagrand moff tarkin rogue onecgiluke skywalker mandalorian reactionvfxx men first classstar wars obi wan alec guinnesscgi faces vs recastsobi wan ewan mcgregorluke skywalker cgi fixedluke skywalker cgi vs deepfakevfx artists reactobi wan kenobigrogustar wars' uncanny valley conundrumvisual effectsobi wan alec guinness vs ewan mcgregorthe mandalorianluke skywalkerstar warsmark hamillprincess leia rogue oneprincess leiadeepfake

Description: Grab Atlas VPN for $1.39/mo before the deal expires: atlasv.pn/FullFatVideos Since Star Wars returned to cinema screens in 2015, Disney has flirted with using visual effects to bring back old faces renewed. From CGI Tarkin and Liea, to Carrie Fisher's missing scenes restored for the Rise of Skywalker, Disney has been leading up to the moment Luke would reveal his face to Din Djarin, Grogu and the principal cast of the Mandalorian. But by looking to Temuera Morrison's key role in season 2, as well as the bondafide casting of Ewan McGregor as Obi Wan, its fair to say that recasting iconic characters would work far better... In this video I break down why I think flesh and blood actors working off each other in a scene is always far superior to the special effects might of recreating faces exactly as they were from a past moment in time. I also look at other examples including the success created by Micheal Fassbender and James McAvoy, portraying the legacy roles of Magneto and Professor X in X-Men: First Class. Follow me on TWITTER: @FullFatVideos - Follow me on INSTAGRAM: full_fat_videos instagram.com/full_fat_videos Any donation you make on PATREON helps Full Fat Videos to keep making content. Find out more at: ►patreon.com/fullfatvideos Facebook: facebook.com/FullFatVideo All footage used in this video is for educational purposes only. #starwars #lukeskywalker #cgi