Channel: ProjectClarity

Category: News & Politics

Tags: chaffetz comeyratcliffe fbi comeycomey testimonyissa reditgowdy comey

Description: Fair Use Notice: This video may contain some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. The video content is mostly News related and is widely available in the public domain. By definition News content widely available from multiple sources would fall within the Fair Use Law. Moreover, when the content is transformative using satire, opinion, or other means including differing analysis based on a compilation of similar content from multiple sources it becomes unique content different from the original sources and does not have an impact on the commercial viability of the source content. We believe this clearly falls under the Fair Use Law of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified, wants us to link to their web site, or wants us to add give them credit for any content in the video. ProjectClarity is "one man's opinion". Anything that is said is either opinion, criticism, information or commentary. Thank You. FBI Comey testifies again as a result of the recent document releases from the FBI. He appears much more defensive than I have ever seen him before. Ratcliffe is brutal. Issa catches Comey in a lie about the immunity agreements. Jordan, Chaffetz, and Gowdy once again just can’t believe how an indictment wasn’t warranted. What I find interesting is the fact that the FBI is not saying who at the FBI is authorizing the release of the documents, but then Comey gets raked over the coals again. Why is the FBI even leaking these documents when they know it is going to further discredit them. Something just doesn’t make sense. There must be something significant going on behind the scenes. Like I said before, it appears that Hillary is being thrown under the bus. The hearing was about 4 hours. They used the usually 5min rule back and forth across party lines. I edited down to 22min picking what I thought was the most relevant testimony from the usual dynamic characters. Ratcliffe was a surprise. Don't know much about him, but he was fun to watch!